Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections
Personal tools
 
You are here: Home Green For All Blog 'Clean' coal is fantasy; state must invest in alternatives

'Clean' coal is fantasy; state must invest in alternatives

Posted by Ada McMahon at Feb 02, 2009 03:10 PM |
 

Crossposted from the Lansing State Journal -- There is no such thing as clean coal. The extraction of coal in Appalachia has destroyed 450 mountaintops and 1,200 miles of rivers and streams by dumping "overfill" into the valleys from mountaintop removal mining. Coal is not clean.

Crossposted from the Lansing State Journal.

By Steve Rall
Lansing State Journal
February 1, 2009

There is no such thing as clean coal. The extraction of coal in Appalachia has destroyed 450 mountaintops and 1,200 miles of rivers and streams by dumping "overfill" into the valleys from mountaintop removal mining. Coal is not clean.

The processing of the coal has left millions of gallons of toxic black slurry in "ponds" that have leeched into aquifers, rendering water sources unusable. Held back by huge earthen dams in former beautiful valleys, one such "pond" burst a few years ago and was described by the EPA as a disaster worse than the Exxon Valdez oil spill (see www.ilovemountains.org). Coal is not clean.

The eight proposed coal-fired power plants in Michigan claim that they will be more efficient and reduce emissions compared to older coal plants they may be replacing. That may be true, but does that make them clean?

Let's look at one, the Rogers City/Wolverine proposal. According to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, this proposed "state of the art" coal plant will emit the following toxic contaminants: particulate matter, 975 tons per year; sulfur dioxide, 1,344 tons per year; nitrogen oxide, 2,647 tons per year; carbon monoxide, 4,002 tons per year; volatile organic compounds, 171.7 tons per year; lead, 0.36 tons per year; sulfuric acid mist, 80 tons per year; fluorides, 8 tons per year. This list does not even include carbon dioxide, which is the leading cause of climate change, nor does it include the leftover ash that is often disposed of in unsafe landfills. Coal is not clean.

Physicians for Social Responsibility (www.psr.org) reports that coal-fired power plants are one of "the nation's largest sources of air pollutants that damage cardiovascular and respiratory health and threaten healthy child development." Coal is not clean.

Finally, so-called "clean coal technology" often refers to "carbon capture and sequestration (CCS)." There is not one CCS demonstration project in the entire United States, let alone a commercial size operation where this theoretical technology has been shown to work. Even if it is possible to safely "bury" or store carbon dioxide, it is estimated that a workable, commercial-size effort is decades away. Should we continue to fund the research? Maybe. But let's be honest about its timing and its promise.

In the current economic climate, it would be crazy to invest billions of dollars into outmoded, polluting coal plants that we will be stuck with for 50 to 60 years. Nor does it make sense to send more of our tax dollars out of state to buy and transport the coal. The health and financial risks for the state, for Lansing and for ratepayers are enormous. Even major banks are pulling back from these projects. No matter how you look at it, coal is a dirty deal.

It makes more sense to invest in vigorous energy- efficiency programs that will create good jobs, help ratepayers reduce their electric bills and reduce our need for electricity. We can then pursue true clean energy.

Steve Rall of Lansing is a member of Lansing Can Do Better, "a coalition promoting reasonable alternatives to new coal plants."

Document Actions

Rogers City/Wolverine proposal

Posted by William Lewis at Feb 09, 2009 08:13 PM
Petroleum coke is not coal and Wolverine has recently been saying they will use up to 70 percent petcoke and up to 20 percent wood or wood residue. That leaves only 10 percent or more coal. They may go ahead with their plans without coal at all. They have also mentioned using switchgrass, a volatile warm-climate prairie grass that may spell big trouble for our northern forests.

Rogers City/Wolverine power plant proposal

Posted by William Lewis at Feb 09, 2009 08:28 PM
Petroleum coke is not coal and Wolverine has been saying they will use up to 70 percent petroleum coke and up to 20 percent wood or wood residue. That leaves only 10 percent or more of coal. They may go ahead with their plans with no coal at all... but is that better than petcoke? They have also mentioned using switchgrass and urging local farmers to plant and gromit. Switchgrass is a volatile warm-climate prairie grass that could spark wildfires.. not only of switchgrass but also of our northern forests. Not a good idea to grow switchgrass among our northern forests!

Rogers City/Wolverine power plant proposal

Posted by William Lewis at Feb 09, 2009 08:33 PM
Petroleum coke is not coal and Wolverine has been saying they will use up to 70 percent petroleum coke and up to 20 percent wood or wood residue. That leaves only 10 percent or more of coal. They may go ahead with their plans with no coal at all... but is petcoke any better than coal? They have also mentioned using switchgrass and urging local farmers to plant and grow it. Switchgrass is a volatile warm-climate prairie grass that could spark wildfires.. not only of switchgrass but also of our northern forests. Not a good idea to grow plantations of switchgrass anywhere near our forests!

The Answer is renewable resouces and education

Posted by Brach Fisher at May 22, 2009 10:26 AM
Individuals need to stop focusing on short economic growth and stop exploiting nonrenewable resources. Michigan is in the top three states for possible wind producing states using windmills to generate energy, yet "clean coal" seems to be an answer=Wrong! No one has mentioned how this "clean coal" is going to affect our future generations, coal is a thing of the past and seems like a drug that Americans are hooked on. Through the release of CO2 from the use of fossil fuels including coal we have managed to speed up the warming of the earth 1,000 percent. This CO2 acts as a green house trapping heat that would be normally released into space. These clean coal lobbyist who role up into communities with their blue prints and sell their product are nothing more then "drug pushers". The two only types of individuals who are supporting these clean coal plants in any form are either making money or uneducated. Through education humans will able to pass the biosphere quality that we obtained it as to future generations. Think with your own mind and ask lots of questions to unbiased individuals!