You are here: Home Green For All Blog The New Face of West Virginia: Sustainability and the Importance of Creative Collaboration

The New Face of West Virginia: Sustainability and the Importance of Creative Collaboration

Posted by Eric Mathis, Green For All Fellow, Class 3 at Aug 26, 2011 06:20 PM |
Filed under:
 

After five long years of hard work, myself and many others have intentionally developed a proactive platform for "community action" and the new face of success for Central Appalachia in the coming years signifying a shift from an issues-based to a solutions-based approach. The hard work that went into making these projects happen is not just limited to the time frame of my short lived residency in West Virginia; these projects were made possible by many initiatives and projects that were present long before my arrival.

The New Face of West Virginia: Sustainability and the Importance of Creative Collaboration

After five long years of hard work, myself and many others have intentionally developed a proactive platform for "community action" and the new face of success for Central Appalachia in the coming years signifying a shift from an issues-based to a solutions-based approach. The hard work that went into making these projects happen is not just limited to the time frame of my short lived residency in West Virginia; these projects were made possible by many initiatives and projects that were present long before my arrival. For instance, if it were not for a visionary local doctor's dream of revitalizing the Williamson Redevelopment Authority and the Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation supplying funds to make Dr. Beckett's dream a reality, Williamson would not be on the cutting edge of developing some of the most innovative approaches to Sustainable Development today. Moreover, before I had the privilege of meeting ex-coalminer Earl Long, Founder and CEO of Angel Winds Renewable Energy LLC, he was already building a new dream for his home state – developing "mom and pop" wind farms across West Virginia. The fact is, the further I tried to trace the cause of my successes the more complex the mosaic becomes.

My message to emerging leaders across the nation today is that among the many struggles that I have had in developing projects during my lifetime the biggest struggle has been to maintain a collaborative/creative atmosphere where:

  • Mistakes are viewed as a process of growth;
  • Oppositions are viewed as opportunities;
  • Assessing overlaps in organizational expertise are far more productive than assessing individual interests;
  • Following through with promises holds far more value than building a perceived reputation among experts and established leaders;
  • As my mentor Keith Pauley has suggested, building relationships becomes the cause and the projects become the effect;
  • The "them" in the all too destructive "us against them" view of the world are typically made up of rational, willing, and often times profoundly ethical human beings.

Although the projects in the video can be seen as a victory for some, more importantly they presently serve as a stepping stone for West Virginia and Central Appalachia as a whole to transcend one of the most destructive mechanism known to them today; A mechanism which is paradoxically maintained by the recent documentary "The Last Mountain" were the only form of local "community action" is a crude example of direct action, a series of symbolic marches/rallies and a misleading wind study which arguably do more harm to West Virginia coal communities than good. These collective (re)actions typically paint a dark and often conspiratorial portrayal of a region marked by corruption, abject poverty, disease, a blatant disregard for the environment and most importantly - conflict. You have to ask yourself, what would happen to Silicon Valley's economic environment if Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition took on the same strategy as other environmental coalitions in our region, that is, attempted to shut down the very industry that maintains a large portion of the state's budget in which they reside? Moreover, how would the employees of the solar industry, Google, Adobe, Facebook, etc. react?

With the above reactive forces at play, it is our hope that through building our projects with a long tradition of creative visionaries such as Kent Spellman and his organization's collaborative projects (e.g., CAP, WVSC and WVFFC), we can begin to build a richer picture of a region that has and still is creating innovative approaches to collaboration – an essential ingredient to sustainability. Just this month, we finalized the installation of a 60-meter meteorological tower to measure the wind for Angel Winds Renewable Energy, the 1st locally-owned community wind farm in Central Appalachia. So in the same tradition of Buckminster Fuller, I along with thousands of West Virginians pronounce through past, present and future successes that "you can never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, [one must] build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."

The JOBS Project has been featured in: BBC World News, NPR's State of the Reunion, Appalshop, Bloomberg Businessweek, and most recently in the June issue of Photon International: PV in Coal Country and Career Change.

Eric Mathis

ERIC MATHIS - Williamson, WV

Eric is a committed entrepreneur who has dedicated the past 10 years of his life to new market-based approaches to sustainable development. Throughout the various projects that he has participated in and/or spearheaded, he has remained true to his commitment of promoting diversity by way of sustainable development through various means which include organic farming, institutional development, education, economics, and more. Read more »

Document Actions

Shame on Eric Mathis, and shame on Green for All

Posted by Rory McIlmoil at Aug 29, 2011 01:54 PM
I and many others who work for justice and economic transition in Appalachia are deeply offended by Eric Mathis, and by Green for All's support of this post. Eric's approach to working in Appalachia is just as polarizing as that of the coal industry, the natural gas industry, and of the politicians who kneel at the alter of destructive, polluting, corrupting industries in the region. This piece is a slap in the face to Mother Jones, to Larry Gibson, to Maria Gunnoe (winner of the international Goldman Environmental Prize, 2010), and to the late and great Judy Bonds (Goldman Environmental Prize, 2003).

Judy died of cancer in early 2011, after years of dedicating her life to ending mountaintop removal coal mining in Central Appalachia. In her later years, she worked hard toward supporting the Coal River Wind project, which Mr. Mathis seems to criticize in this post, by criticizing the study that proved that wind power served as a viable option to a 10 square mile mountaintop removal site--operated by Massey Energy. Mr. Mathis offers no specific criticism of the study other than a general one. By doing so, and by criticizing the organizations that work hard toward bringing environmental justice to the coalfields, he does the exact thing that he purports not to do, namely, further polarize opposing sides together rather than bringing them together, in stating that "the "them" in the all too destructive "us against them" view of the world are typically made up of rational, willing, and often times profoundly ethical human beings."

Does Eric not believe that Judy Bonds, or Maria Gunnoe, or Mother Jones were "ethical"?? Is Eric's philosophy consistent with that of Van Jones, who states that "is the movement to ensure that no community suffers disproportionate environmental burdens or goes without enjoying fair environmental benefits."

Does Eric not recognize the dedication and life-long passion of coalfield community organizations toward the very same goal of ensuring "that no community suffers disproportionate environmental burdens"?? He appears to ignore the contributions of the true heroes of the coalfields altogether.

Furthermore, aside from being offensive to many who have dedicated their lives toward bringing environmental justice to communities who have long suffered poverty, cancer, and oppression, Eric's post here is more arrogant than statements made by the coal industry itself.

Shame on Eric Mathis for believing he is the equivalent of Buckminster Fuller, and SHAME on Green for All for supporting such a polarizing, misleading, and arrogant piece of writing. Eric is no Fuller, and he's no Van Jones. He is the symbol of superiority, and until he can show that he has created even ten full time jobs in Central Appalachia--other than the out-of-towners who come to work for him on a part-time basis--then he has no right to claim that his vision for "success in Central Appalachia."

Just ask groups who are doing real economic development work in the region such as the Mountain Association for Community Economic Development, or who are working toward real environmental justice--such as Green for All purports to do--such as the late Judy Bonds, who would have turned 59 tomorrow had she not been stricken down by cancer, in the coalfields. Who would have guessed.

wind study

Posted by Holly Garrett at Aug 29, 2011 01:54 PM
Hi Eric, I was wondering if you could elaborate on how the wind study you cite is misleading. I do not follow. Thanks!

Disgusted

Posted by Bob Kincaid at Aug 29, 2011 01:55 PM
My primary inquiry, Eric, is whether your opinion is endorsed by Green For All.

Your opinion as expressed manifests profound elitism and fundamental lack of understanding of the human rights crisis that afflicts Southern West Virginia and much of Central Appalachia.

As Judy Bonds, one of those people you spit on by refering to "symbolic marches/rallies" that you describe as doing "more harm than good," noted in a video I viewed just this evening, we have people supposedly on our side who would stab us in the back. Pardon us while we pull out your shiv.

I would remind you, Eric, that "collaborator" has more than one meaning, and it looks like you've taken a plain stand in the corner represented by the pejorative meaning of collaborator.

Some of us, Eric, have nothing left with which to compromise or collaborate. The coal industry you appear to protect, and with whom you apparently wish to collaborate, has already taken all of it.

no subject

Posted by Holly Garrett at Aug 29, 2011 01:55 PM
To compare mountain top removal mining to Silicon Valley is, well, insulting.

Eric

Posted by Bo Webb at Aug 29, 2011 01:55 PM
I first met Eric 4-6 years ago when he came to the Coal River Valley. He brought a 12 pack of beer to my house. We sat and talked about mountaintop removal, environmental justice, the poisoning of our communities and our people. He seemed profoundly shaken by the injustice that he was witnessing. He soon went to work for an attorney that I had invited to Coal River to investigate the health problems we were experiencing and in particular the health issues we were seeing at Marsh Fork Elementary School. Eric called me time to time seeking information about students, parents, and staff. I could have felt like I was being used to do the work he was being paid to do, but I liked him and thought his heart was in the right place so I helped him all I could. A lawsuit against Massey Energy was developed and filed, and apparently Eric was ready to move on.
His motives for insulting the people who have fought for their civil and human rights are questionable at least; and this is not the first time he has done this. Three years ago, while working for a non-profit Eric was interviewed by a local newspaper and arrogantly disrespected the work of local community activists opposing mountaintop removal. He was called to a meeting with these people and expressed his sorrow. He actually cried and swore that nothing like this would ever happen again, never. He was forgiven and we moved on.
Looking back on this incident three years ago with Eric I remember that we were placing a lot of pressure on the coal industry. Anti mountaintop removal protest were in high gear, people were being arrested, it was all over the news, and it was getting coverage across the country. The coal industry was buying commercial time to spout their lies in an attempt to discredit us. And then out of the blue came Eric discrediting our work and our fight for justice; kissing up to the coal industry. Presently we are applying even bigger pressure on the coal industry with recent science peer reviewed research that concludes people in mountaintop removal communities have higher rates of cancer, higher rates of kidney and heart decease and much higher rates of birth defects. And here comes Eric, again. It is my belief that Eric is short on morals and tall on ambition. His words speak for themselves. Anyone reading this can see this guy is not of right mind. He is a narcissist, in love with himself. He sees himself as someone destined to accomplish great things and thinks nothing of using others to satisfy his ego and sick mind. Apparently he has been feeling a bit left out of recent media attention to mtr and felt compelled to write this garbage. I suspect he thinks he is using the coal industry as much as he has used us,…… or perhaps they are using him. How much money can one make working on a project for five long hard years that hasn’t generated a penny in return?


In Defense of Mr. Mathis

Posted by Brad Hankins at Sep 28, 2011 05:45 PM
Forgive me for speaking out of turn, but I am sure Eric is just as much in opposition of mountain-top removal, and the pollution & disease caused by coal mining as the next green energy advocate. In fact he calls it, "most destructive mechanism known to them today". The take home point that I got from his article is that rallying and pointing fingers at the problem largely stands to create conflict and friction.

We all know that coal is in finite supply, and that the jobs it creates are indefinite, dangerous and fleeting. Though coal may produce the cheapest kilowatt hour in paper.. when you factor in unforeseen costs it pales in comparison to getting energy directly from the sun.

I, for one, applaud Mr. Mathis's efforts.

To fight against the coal industry you don't wage a face-to-face battle. Instead undermine them by taking their employees.. even one at a time... and placing them in a job that is safer for them, the community, and the environment as a whole. Make an alternative job market.

I am sure that is what he meant by using the Buckminster Fuller quote. "Make the existing model obsolete."

I don't think he or anyone else (besides those who stand to lose profits) would say that the miners, their families, and the community shouldn't receive compensation for the ills that have befallen them. Yes, justice needs to be served! The coal simply looks cheaper on the surface. The ACTUAL cost is seen in the health of the workers, the detriment to the environment, and the poor state of the community.

But while you wait for justice... BE the change you wish to see in the world.

Keep up the good work, Eric!

Posted by sierra bell at Sep 28, 2011 05:45 PM
It looks like you're doing important and exciting work, Eric. The Fuller quote is lovely, and so very true. Making 'the existing model obsolete' is certainly the way to go, and producing solar and wind energy in Appalachia is clearly an excellent way to start doing that!

It's vital to note, though, that marches and rallies should not be dismissed even if they are 'merely' symbolic. We live in a world of symbols, and symbols are powerful things! Even if such collective actions don't necessarily produce the political, economic, and environmental changes that need to occur, they do surely serve to bring people together and strengthen the activist community. This can be a powerful action in and of itself! So while I agree with you that perhaps people's energy would be better spent on innovation than conflict, I can also see that both are useful and necessary in the struggle to end mountaintop removal and other destructive forms of energy production.

That said, thanks for all your hard work, and good luck! I hope that more and more communities in Appalachia and beyond can transition to green energy, and that the old model does indeed become obsolete.